…or rather functions
grep(): a function that searches for patterns in a given "character" vector.
Example:
# Search for "GC" in a set of primer sequences
> seq <- c("GTGGGGCATTTACGTGGCT", "AATTAAACATGTAG",
"GCGCAAATAGTCT", "AAAGACAGTGATGACCC")
> grep("GC", seq, perl = TRUE, value = FALSE)
[1] 1 3
If the argument value = FALSE or value is unspecified, grep() will return the indices of matching elements not the elements themselves.
With value = TRUE it will show the elements.
# Showing elements now...
> grep("GC", seq, perl = TRUE, value = TRUE)
[1] "GTGGGGCATTTACGTGGCT" "GCGCAAATAGTCT"
Welche(s) Muster findet atg[tc]{3,9}.*a+?
sub() Like grep() this function will look for matching pattern in a character vector's elements. Those will be replaced by the second argument. (First hit per element only.)
> sub("GC", "GT", seq, perl = TRUE)
[1] "GTGGGGTATTTACGTGGCT" "AATTAAACATGTAG" "GTGCAAATAGTCT"
[4] "AAAGACAGTGATGACCC"
gsub() in contrast to sub() this will replace all occurences per element.
> gsub("GC", "GT", seq, perl = TRUE)
[1] "GTGGGGTATTTACGTGGTT" "AATTAAACATGTAG" "GTGTAAATAGTCT" "AAAGACAGTGATGACCC"
apply() will apply a given function on all elements of an argument matrix, vector or array. It's the R-ish way of relying on vectorized functions instead of traditional loops.
Generalized form:
apply(X, MARGIN, FUN, ...)
Example: Define a matrix and get the highest values per column:
> X <- matrix(c(2, 10, 8, 5, 18, 7,
9, 4, 17), nrow = 3)
> apply(X, 2, max)
[1] 10 18 17
lapply() apply a function to list elements (or dataframe, or vector). Will return a result list of equal length.
Generalized form:
lapply(X, FUN, ...)
E.g.: Generate a dataframe Wwith expression values for a couple of genes (MEDEA, FIS, FIE, PHE, MEI) in to replicates (rep1 und rep2):
# data.frame with gene names and expression values
> data <- data.frame(genes = c("MEDEA", "FIS", "FIE", "PHE", "MEI"),
expr_rep1 = c(122, 1028, 10, 458, 77), exprs_rep2 = c(98, 999, 20, 387, 81),
stringsAsFactors = FALSE)
> data
genes expr_rep1 exprs_rep2
1 MEDEA 122 98
2 FIS 1028 999
3 FIE 10 20
4 PHE 458 387
5 MEI 77 81
# get log2 of the values
> y <- lapply(data[,2:3], log2)
# Returned result list
> y
$expr_rep1
[1] 6.930737 10.005625 3.321928 8.839204 6.266787
$exprs_rep2
[1] 6.614710 9.964341 4.321928 8.596190 6.339850
With sapply() we get a "simple object" as a result. Here, it's a matrix:
> z <- sapply(data[, 2:3], log2)
> z
expr_rep1 exprs_rep2
[1,] 6.930737 6.614710
[2,] 10.005625 9.964341
[3,] 3.321928 4.321928
[4,] 8.839204 8.596190
[5,] 6.266787 6.339850
Function | Input | Output |
---|---|---|
aggregate | dataframe | dataframe |
apply | array-like | array-like/list |
by | dataframe | list |
lapply | e.g. list | list |
mapply | arrays | array-like/list |
sapply | e.g. list | array-like |
It's not always easy to pick the right "apply-like function".
# e.g. a vector
> a<-2:11
> length(a)
[1] 10
# e.g. a matrix
> a<-matrix(1:12,nrow=3) # e.g. matrix
> a
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4]
[1,] 1 4 7 10
[2,] 2 5 8 11
[3,] 3 6 9 12
> length(a)
[1] 12
NB.…
# e.g. dataframe
> b<-data.frame(1:2, 2:3)
> b
X1.4 X2.5
1 1 2
2 2 3
> length(b)
[1] 2
# vector
> a<-1:11
> a
[1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
> rev(a)
[1] 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
# matrix
m<-matrix(1:12,nrow=3)
> m
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4]
[1,] 1 4 7 10
[2,] 2 5 8 11
[3,] 3 6 9 12
> rev(m)
[1] 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
And…
# data frame
> rev(data)
exprs_rep2 expr_rep1 genes
1 98 122 MEDEA
2 999 1028 FIS
3 20 10 FIE
4 387 458 PHE
5 81 77 MEI
Descriptive Statistics: Summarize, order and describe data.
Examples for diagrams commonly used to describe data are Boxplots, Pies, Histograms
R implements:
A pie chart is used to display fractions of a population as sections of a circle.
The main function is pie()
Generalized form:
> pie(x, labels, radius, main, col, clockwise)
# In the following example we will display cultivation
# statistics for farmer Ernst's land as percentages
# of the total area
# Generate data
> x <- c(5, 10, 7, 3, 4, 68)
> labels <- c("Zucchini", "Tomaten", "Gurken", "Feldsalat", "Rosenkohl", "Mais")
# Define file name and format
> png(file = "Ernsts_field.png")
# Generate Pie
> pie(x, labels, clockwise = TRUE)
# Save graphics file
> dev.off()
# Generate data
> x <- c(5, 10, 7, 3, 4, 68)
> labels <- c("Zucchini", "Tomaten", "Gurken", "Feldsalat", "Rosenkohl", "Mais")
# nameing the file
> png(file = "Ernsts_Acker_neu.png")
# Generate the chart
> pie(x, labels, main = "Ernsts Acker", col = rainbow(length(x)))
# Save graphics
> dev.off()
> x <- c(5, 10, 7, 3, 4, 68)
> labels <- c("5%", "10%", "7%", "3%", "4%", "68%")
>
> png(file = "Ernsts_Acker_Anteile.png")
>
> pie(x, labels, main = "Gemuesebauer Ernsts Acker",col = rainbow(length(x)))
> legend("topright",
c("Zucchini", "Tomaten", "Gurken", "Feldsalat", "Rosenkohl", "Mais"),
cex = 0.8, fill = rainbow(length(x)))
> # Save the file.
> dev.off()
A different possibility to display data is the bar chart. Generate it in R with the function barplot().
Generalized form:
barplot(H, xlab, ylab, main, names.arg, col)
> # Generate data
>
> H <- c(5, 10, 7, 3, 4, 68)
> M <- c("Zucchini", "Tomaten", "Gurken", "Feldsalat", "Rosenkohl", "Mais")
>
> # labelling the chart
> png(file = "Ernsts_Acker_Balkendiagramm.png")
>
> # generate the chart
>
> barplot(H,names.arg = M,xlab = "Feldfruechte", ylab = "Anbauflaeche in %",
col = "gray", main = "Ernsts Acker Balkendiagramm", border = "black")
> # save the graphics file
> dev.off()
Generalized form:
hist(v,main,xlab,xlim,ylim,breaks,col,border)
mit
Like this:
> x <- rnorm(1000)
In its most simple form we get a histogram by just calling the hist() function with its defaults:
> hist(x)
We didn't specify a filename and type, so the graphics should just be displayed on-screen.
# a labelled histogram from random data
> hist(x, main = "Histogram Example", xlab = "Zufallszahlen", ylab = "Anzahl")
# and finally a box around it:
> box()
To further prettify the histogram we'll define the bar colors with col. We can also define the separation intervals on the x axis with breaks. With breaks = 50 we define that the x axis will have 50 intervals.
# The Code:
> hist(x, main = "Histogram example", xlab = "Some random",
ylab = "number", col = "deepskyblue", breaks = 50)
> box()
In the generalized form:
plot(v,type,col,xlab,ylab)we can choose plotting points type = "p", lines type = "l" or both type = "o".
Example:
> linie <- c(27:7)
> plot(linie, type = "o", col = "deepskyblue", xlab = "x", ylab = "y")
plot(x, y, main, xlab, ylab, xlim, ylim, axes)
Our example will be the exercise dataframe "mtcars", already available in R.
>?mtcars
mtcars {datasets} R Documentation
Motor Trend Car Road Tests
Description
...
Format
A data frame with 32 observations on 11 variables.
[, 1] mpg Miles/(US) gallon
[, 2] cyl Number of cylinders
[, 3] disp Displacement (cu.in.)
[, 4] hp Gross horsepower
...
# create a dataframe
> input <- mtcars[, c(1,6)]
> head(input)
mpg wt
Mazda RX4 21.0 2.620
Mazda RX4 Wag 21.0 2.875
Datsun 710 22.8 2.320
Hornet 4 Drive 21.4 3.215
Hornet Sportabout 18.7 3.440
Valiant 18.1 3.460
# Naming the plot file
> png(file = "scatterplot_mtcars.png")
# Plotting mpg and wt for all cars with a weight between
# 2 and 5 and mpg from 16.4 to 30
> plot(x = input$wt, y = input$mpg, main = "Scatterplot",
xlab = "wt", ylab = "mpg", xlim = c(2, 5), ylim = c(16.4, 30))
Arithmetic mean is also called average.
It's calculated as the sum of the values divided by their number.
# Create a vector
> x <- c(10, 100, 234, 65, 77, 34, 88, 98, 504, 1)
# calculate the mean
> mean(x)
[1] 121.1
# skip highest and lowest 10% of values
> mean(x, trim = 0.1)
[1] 88.25
# sort() will, well, sort the vector
> y <- sort(x)
# skip highest and lowest value
# (first and last after sorting)
> mean(y[2:9])
[1] 88.25
# create a vector with some missing data in it
> x <- c(10, 100, 234, NA, 65, 77, 34, 88, 98, 504, 1, NA)
# mean() will thus result in:
> mean(x)
[1] NA
# Now we allow it to skip missing data:
> mean(x, na.rm = TRUE)
[1] 121.1
To calculate the median we first have to sort the data by size.
The median is the value that…
# Let's have another vector, shall we?
> x <- c(10, 100, 234, 65, 77, 34, 88, 98, 504, 1)
# And a median, if you please.
> median(x)
[1] 82.5
But you can use the function table to find out.
> table(round(runif(100)*10))
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 13 9 10 7 14 9 8 12 6 8
# so, modus is 5 here.
To understand how data are distributed (variance) we first have to check how different the datapoints are from the mean.
> wert <- c(10, 8, 5, 9, 7, 6, 3, 11)
First let's look at the highest and lowest values:
> range(wert)
[1] 3 11
People spent between 3 and 11 €. Values are heavily influenced by outliers.
# Average is calculated with mean().
> mean(wert)
[1] 7.375
We are interested in the amount the values differ from the mean.
> diffs <- wert - mean(wert)
> diffs
[1] 2.625 0.625 -2.375 1.625 -0.375 -1.375 -4.375 3.625
# Create the function
# (Your first own function!)
> variance <- function(x)sum(((x-mean(x))^2))/(length(x)-1)
# Call the function
> variance(wert)
[1] 7.125
# Because the difference from the mean can be positive
# or negative we'd use the square of the sums
Variance is calculated with the function var() in R.
> var(wert)
[1] 7.125
In R you can just use the function sd().
# The standard deviation from the presents' value is:
> sd(wert)
[1] 2.66927
# Or by using sqrt() as a control:
> sqrt(var(wert))
[1] 2.66927
> boxplot(wert, ylab = "Euro",
main = "Wichtel prices")
According to the "Central Limiting Value Theorem" ("Zentraler Grenzwertsatz") the means of a large number of random unrelated samples are ± normally distributed.
# Plotting average of random numbers
> means <- numeric(100000)
> for (i in 1:100000){
means[i]<-mean(runif(5)*10)
}
> hist(means, ylim = c(0, 16000))
# mean and sd of 100000 averages
> mean(means)
[1] 5.0026
> sd(means)
[1] 1.291312
dnorm(x, mean, sd) # allgemeine Form
# We generate a sequence of numbers between 0 and 10
# incrementing by 0.1 on the x axis
> xwerte <- seq(0, 10, 0.1)
# mean and sd for the density distribution on y
> ywerte <- dnorm(xwerte, mean = 5.0026, sd = 1.291312) * 50000 #scaling
> lines(xwerte, ywerte, col = "red", type="l")
# Comparison of Normal and Student's t
# t-Distribution for a sample with 5 degrees of freedom
# (1) Normal distrib. in blue
> xwerte <- seq(-4, 4, 0.1)
> ywerte <- dnorm(xwerte)
> plot(xwerte, ywerte, type = "l", lty = 1,
col = "deepskyblue", xlab = "Abweichung",
ylab = "Densitydistrib. Probability")
# t-Distribution with 5 degrees of freedom
# (2) in red and dashed
> ywerte <- dt(xwerte, df=5)
> lines(xwerte, ywerte, type = "l", lty = 2, col = "red")
68% of the data will end up within ± one standard deviation of the mean.
# We use pnorm() to calculate how much of the data
# are smaller than mean-1 sd.
> pnorm(-1)
[1] 0.1586553
> 1-pnorm(1)
[1] 0.1586553
If we want to know within ± which standard deviation with normally distributed data we will find 95% of our data we define a confidence interval with qnorm()
> qnorm(c(0.025, 0.975))
[1] -1.959964 1.959964
95% of all our data are in the range of the mean ±1.96 standard deviations given normal distribtion!
# plotting a normal distrib.
seeds <- seq(30, 90, 0.1)
plot(seeds, dnorm(seeds, 60, 8), type = "l",
xlab = "seeds", ylab = "probability")
What is the probability that an arbitrary silique holds 45 seeds?
Calculating the z-Score:
> z <- (45-60)/8
> z
[1] -1.875
What is the probability that a silique contains between 56 and 63 seeds?
> z1 <- (56-60)/8
> z2 <- (63-60)/8
> z1
[1] -0.5
> z2
[1] 0.375
Now, we subtract the lower probability from the higher one:
> pnorm(0.375)-pnorm(-0.5)
[1] 0.3376322
Probability is almost 34%!
General Method:
As an example we generate a dataset from the number of well-developed seeds per silique in two different
Boechera divaricarpa plants:
# Let's read in the dataset from a file on the web.
> samen <- read.table('https://ephedra.cos.uni-heidelberg.de/presentations/open/R-Frontiers/downloads/Samen.txt', header=T)
> attach(samen) # ...to search path, optionally
> names(samen)
[1] "Pflanze1" "Pflanze2"
# See the variances
> var(Pflanze1)
[1] 68.44444
> var(Pflanze2)
[1] 84.88889
> var.test(Pflanze1, Pflanze2)
F test to compare two variances
data: Pflanze1 and Pflanze2
F = 0.80628, num df = 9, denom df = 9, p-value = 0.7536
alternative hypothesis: true ratio of variances is not equal to 1
95 percent confidence interval:
0.2002692 3.2460895
sample estimates:
ratio of variances
0.8062827
# Null hypothesis is accepted. Variances are equal.
I.e. these data may be compared with a t-Test!
Question: Are the average values of two independent samples different?
Formula for the t-Test:
The t-Test refers to the standard error (SEM, standard error of the mean):
As an example we test if the average values of seed creation in plant 1 and plant 2 are different.
Let's first graphically check the data with a "Box and Whiskers Plot":
> boxplot(samen[,1], samen[,2], data = samen, xlab = "Pflanzen",
ylab = "entwickelte Samen", col = c("blue", "red"),
names = c("Pflanze1", "Pflanze2"), main = "Boechera divaricarpa")
In R you calculate the t-Test with the function t.test()
Generalized form:
t.test(x, ...) # x=vector of numerical data
t.test(x, y = NULL, alternative = c("two.sided", "less", "greater"),
mu = 0, paired = FALSE, var.equal = FALSE,
conf.level = 0.95, ...)
In this example we use the following:
# two-sided t-Test for two independent samples with equal variance
> t.test(samen[,1], samen[,2], alternative = c("two.sided"), mu = 0,
paired = FALSE, var.equal = TRUE, conf.level = 0.95)
Two Sample t-test
data: samen[, 1] and samen[, 2]
t = 0.25538, df = 18, p-value = 0.8013
alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
95 percent confidence interval:
-7.226749 9.226749
sample estimates:
mean of x mean of y
51 50
The Null hypothesis is accepted here, ther's no significant difference in mean values
# Fuehrt zu demselben Resultat
> t.test(samen[,1], samen[,2], var.equal = TRUE)
Another example
Two R courses with 10 students each are scored with points. Vector x is the points distribution for course a, vector y for course b.
> x <- c(45, 57, 42, 85, 47, 90, 75, 82, 93, 50)
> y <- c(85, 88, 77, 95, 99, 80, 74, 93, 82, 94)
# Testing variances
> var.test(x, y)
F test to compare two variances
data: x and y
F = 5.8028, num df = 9, denom df = 9, p-value = 0.01518
alternative hypothesis: true ratio of variances is not equal to 1
95 percent confidence interval:
1.441344 23.362213
sample estimates:
ratio of variances
5.802843
# Box and Whiskers Plot
> boxplot(x, y, ylab = "Punkte", names = c("Kurs 1", "Kurs 2"),
col = c("orange", "red"), main = "Kursbewertungen")
Welch's t-Test assumes two normally distributed populations with unequal variances and uses the hypothesis that they have equal mean values.
# Welch t-Test using standard parameters
> t.test(x, y)
Welch Two Sample t-test
data: x and y
t = -2.8897, df = 12.012, p-value = 0.01357
alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
95 percent confidence interval:
-35.25367 -4.94633
sample estimates:
mean of x mean of y
66.6 86.7
Used to compare two distributions or abundances.
$$ \chi^2 = \sum\frac{(\text{observed abundance} - \text{expected abundance})^2}{\text{expected abundance}} $$Chi-square tests are often used in the context of genetics.
Let's for example ask if an antibiotics resistance segregates in a Mendelian way in two Arabidopsis mutant lines.
In an Arabidopsis line we counted 263 resistant seedlings and 93 sensitive ones. The ratio to be expected according to Mendel would be 3:1 (resistant:sensitive).
# Generating a matrix:
> colnames = c("observed", "expected")
> rownames = c("resistant", "sensitive")
> genetik <- matrix(c(263, 93, 267, 89), byrow = FALSE,
nrow = 2, dimnames = list(rownames, colnames))
> genetik
observed expected
resistent 263 267
sensitiv 93 89
> chi <- ((263-267)^2/267)+((93-89)^2/89)
> chi
[1] 0.2397004
We need a critical value to compare against. To look up the critical value for the Chi-square distribution we need the number of degrees of freedom (here it's 1) and the α-level (here: p = 0.95)
# Look up critical value
> qchisq(0.95, 1)
[1] 3.841459
Important: If the statistically derived value is higher than the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected!
# Now let's make R do it...
> count <- matrix(c(263, 93), nrow = 2)
> count
[,1]
[1,] 263
[2,] 93
> chisq.test(count, p = c(3/4, 1/4))
Chi-squared test for given probabilities
data: count
X-squared = 0.2397, df = 1, p-value = 0.6244
The generalized mathematical form is: y = ax + b
For the regression we call the R function lm().
As an example we compare a function of ten individuals.
# Let's create vectors with size and weight
> size <- c(143, 152, 163, 198, 201, 174, 178, 169, 183, 192)
> weight <- c(51, 63, 59, 110, 87, 89, 70, 72, 85, 99)
# Visualization
> plot(weight, size, col = "blue",
main = "Size and weight regression",
abline(lm(size ~ weight)),cex = 1.3,
pch = 16,xlab = "weight in Kg",ylab = "size in cm")
# lm() will output the coefficients (a, b)
> lm(size ~ weight)
Call:
lm(formula = size ~ weight)
Coefficients:
(Intercept) weight
104.5534 0.9012
It's the aim of the method to minimize (the squares of) the deviations.
"Analysis of Variance", can be used for hypothesis testing when more than two groups are involved.
It is similar to t-Tests (testing averages) with multiple combinations.
$$ H_{0} : \mu_{1} = \mu_{2} = ... =\mu_{n} $$ $$ H_{A} : \text{means are not all equal} $$Anova is usually conducted on a given model, in most cases a linear regression (lm()) is used.
# Let's load some sample data:
> pg<-read.table('https://ephedra.cos.uni-heidelberg.de/presentations/open/R-Frontiers/downloads/pg.txt', header=T)
> head(pg)
weight group
1 4.17 ctrl
2 5.58 ctrl
3 5.18 ctrl
...
Dry weights of plant individuals were measured after different treatments. There are three groups in the dataset: a control group plus two different treatments.
ANOVA in R can be done by nesting the linear regression inside the aov() function.
> pgaov <- aov(lm(weight ~ group, data = pg))
> summary(pgaov)
Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
group 2 3.766 1.8832 4.846 0.0159 *
Residuals 27 10.492 0.3886
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
The "one star" rating tells us that there are quite significant differences between the means of the groups.
A "post-hoc" analysis. After e.g. an ANOVA-Analysis, Post-Hoc-Analyses will give more information about the distinct groups.
It is a modified t-Test comparing the means of all groups, i.e. treatments in the analysis.
> pgtk <- TukeyHSD(pgaov)
> pgtk
Tukey multiple comparisons of means
95% family-wise confidence level
Fit: aov(formula = lm(weight ~ group, data = pg))
$group
diff lwr upr p adj
trt1-ctrl -0.371 -1.0622161 0.3202161 0.3908711
trt2-ctrl 0.494 -0.1972161 1.1852161 0.1979960
trt2-trt1 0.865 0.1737839 1.5562161 0.0120064
>plot(pgtk)
Groups trt1-ctrl and trt2-ctrl incorporate 0 in the confidence interval.
Only trt1/2 have a p-value suggesting significance.
p adj
trt1-ctrl 0.3908711
trt2-ctrl 0.1979960
trt2-trt1 0.0120064
HSD.test() from package agricolae provides another way of performing Tukey's test. With a little more verbose output.
> HSD.test(pgaov, trt = 'group')
...
## $groups
## trt means M
## 1 trt2 5.526 a
## 2 ctrl 5.032 ab
## 3 trt1 4.661 b
# same letter means not significantly different.
Generate a scatterplot of the values of log(1) to log(100) on the x-axis against the numbers from 1 to 100 on the y-axis.
Use a histogram to show the distribution of the petal lenghts of the species "setosa" of the Iris dataset.
Use a box and whiskers plot to show the lenght of the petals of the two species "setosa" and "virginica".
Plot the mean values of the lengths of length of petals of "setosa" and of "virginica" using a barplot (barplot()). Add the standard deviations of the means of the petal length as error bars.
To do so you will need the function barplot2() of the package gplots. Install and load gplots and check the help for the function barplot2().Test if the mean values of the petal length of "setosa" and "virginica" are significantly different.
Based on the Iris dataset we would like to ask if the sepal width is significantly higher in thespecies "virginica" as compared to "setosa". To be on the safe side we test vice versa if the sepal width of "virginica" is significantly smaller as comared to "setosa".
Perform the test statistics and visualize the differences grafically.
In the laboratory you are checking mutant Arabidopsis lines with a defect during seed development. By opening the siliques you have counted all seeds that developed normally (norm), as well the the onces that show abort (abort). Of these lines 4 siliques each of 3 plants have been counted and the data were safed in the file seedabort.txt. Read in the data into R and inspect them. Analyse if the underlying defect is gamtophytic or zygotic. In case of a gametophytic defect you expect the ratio of norm : abort to be 1 : 1. In case of a sporophytic effect you expect the ratio to be 3 : 1. Please test both possibilities using an appropriate test statistics.
Here we use an example dataset from wikibooks.org.
We generate the dataset using the following syntax:
> x <- c(1, 3, 6, 11, 12, 15, 19, 23, 28, 33, 35, 39, 47, 60, 66, 73)
> y <- c(3180, 2960, 3220, 3270, 3350, 3410, 3700, 3830, 4090, 4310, 4360, 4520, 4650, 5310, 5490, 5540)
> bsp5 <- data.frame(x,y)
> colnames(bsp5) <- c("Lebenstag", "Gewicht")
Create a Scatterplot containing a regression line.
Randomly draw five numbers between 1 and 6 for 1000 times and calculate the mean values. Draw a histogram of the mean values.
Calculate the mean value of the mean and the standard deviation.
Plot the normal distribution in the same graph as the histogram.
Plot the curve for the t-distribution with 4 degrees of freedom in the limits between ± 5 degrees of freedom. Mark the intervall containing 95 % of all values.